When developing research projects, learners need to take into consideration possible Ethics issues that may arise from their research methods. The learner must be able to discuss potential issues with key role players in their project. Key role players may be the following:
Conducting the research and exhibiting
When conducting research, you must abide by the laws of the Republic of South Africa and the Expo rules and regulations for both conducting the research and exhibiting it. There are two processes that projects go through at Expo:
Ethics:
Ethics Statement
Ethics Process
Learner(s)
Educator(s)
Regional Science Fair Director
Provincial Coordinator
Ethics Committee
The Expo Ethics Review is done in 2 stages
Ethics Guidelines
Read the full Expo Ethics Guidelines here. All ethics related queries must be sent to ethics@exposcience.co.za
Human Testing
If your research project will involve humans (whether yourself, family or any other person), in any way, you must commit to their well-being, protection and safety. Determine whether or not your research will appear safe, reasonable and acceptable. Avoid any harm the research might cause to the participants e.g. pain, stress, fatigue, emotional distress, and embarrassment.
Animal Testing
Research on animals, both vertebrates and invertebrates, must be conducted without causing any harm or distress. You will need ethical clearance from the Expo ethics review committee (ethics@exposcience.co.za) and a recognised research institute. Avoid any harm the research might cause to the animals e.g. pain, stress, fatigue and emotional distress.
Hazardous Biological Agents
Hazardous Biological Agents (HBAs) are microorganisms or toxins that may cause an infection, allergy or otherwise pose a hazard to human health. They are classified into four groups, according to their hazard level.
Group 1
Group 2
Group 3
Group 4
Hazardous chemicals, devices or activities
Hazardous chemicals
Hazardous devices
Hazardous activities
Review Committees
Ethics Committee
This committee consists of a group of qualified and experienced professionals in the sciences, who inspects and reviews projects that have been flagged for the following:
- Breaking or transgression of any law of the country,
- Non-compliance with the Expo Ethics Statement,
- Non-compliance with the provincial and national rules and laws governing human and animal research,
- No evidence of risks being properly assessed,
- No evidence of efforts made to use alternative methods to animal or human testing,
- Inhumane treatment of animals,
- Evidence of plagiarism
- Absence of the required documents and forms required for the research.
Review Committees
Scientific Review Committee
This committee consists of a group of qualified scientists that are responsible for evaluating research projects that have been flagged at Expo, specifically at the International Science Fair (ISF).
- Evidence of review from the Expo Ethics Committee
- Evidence of supervision by an appropriate and qualified adult/scientist,
- Plagiarism.
Plagiarism
Using another person’s words or ideas and presenting them as your own is known as plagiarism. DO NOT submit the same project as your friend, sibling or relative exhibited at a science fair before. Plagiarised projects will be disqualified at any Expo event. All Expo participants must sign a declaration indicating that the research has not been plagiarised.
The following are examples of plagiarism:
2. Project Display Approval
To ensure that your project is eligible to compete at an Expo science fair; it must comply with Expo’s display and safety regulations. A Project Display Approval team identifies issues with the project poster and prototype and provides instructions for further action. During this process, ‘fixable’ issues are rectified before judging takes place. Please note that the following are not allowed at any Expo science fair: